Academy award Winning Actor Jon Voight (also known as the famous father of Angelina Jolie), seems to think young Americans are too stupid to make up their minds and are voting for Obama because they are being brainwashed or something.This from the guy who thought “Mr 9/11” was an angel sent by God. Usually I don’t give a damn what celebrities think, but they all have just as much of a right to express thier views on politics and other matters as I have. Now maybe the American people aren’t always that well informed, but I have to ask aside from enduring the brutality of being a prisoner of war and having served courageously in the Vietnam War, why should a person vote for McCain? As I have stated in the past, what does McCain and the conservatives support besides attacking Obama and carrying on the failures of the shameful and destructive Bush/Cheney administration? Here is Voight in an op-ed which appeared in the Washington Times.
The Democrats have targeted young people, knowing how easy it is to bring forth whatever is needed to program their minds. I know this process well. I was caught up in the hysteria during the Vietnam era, which was brought about through Marxist propaganda underlying the so-called peace movement. The radicals of that era were successful in giving the communists power to bring forth the killing fields and slaughter 2.5 million people in Cambodia and South Vietnam. Did they stop the war, or did they bring the war to those innocent people? In the end, they turned their backs on all the horror and suffering they helped create and walked away.
Those same leaders who were in the streets in the ’60s are very powerful today in their work to bring down the Iraq war and to attack our president, and they have found their way into our schools. William Ayers is a good example of that.
Now I am fine with Voight voicing his political opinions and observations, just like I am fine with Susan Sarandon doing hers. However, in regards to Vietnam and Cambodia, I think Voight needs a bit of a history lesson. Voight should recall that it was President Nixon who chose to bomb Laos and Cambodia in 1972. That action costs thousands of Cambodians and Loatians thier lives and resulted in anger towards thier previously netural, delicate, and slightly pro-U.S leaders and brought to power the anti-U.S Khmer Rogue. It was this that helped bring the Khmer Rogue and other insidious brutalizers to power in those two countries that neighbor Vietnam.
As for Vietnam itself, it seems the people there sadly would have faced oppression either way. Don’t get me wrong Ho Chi Minh and the North Vietnamese were no angels, they were ruthless and demanded the complete obedience of the people of Vietnam. However, the U.S backed so-called “democratic” government of South Vietnam fared little better. they were inept, corrupt, and in many ways every bit as authoritarian as their North Vietnamese counterparts.
In the end Vietnam, in both North and South sought to become one country, and it was the U.S and a handful of anti-communists, against others who were either pro-communist, sought national independence, or were just indifferent either way.
In short, we wanted South Vietnam to stand up and become a western style democracy more than they either could or desired.
And the new McCarthyism doesn’t work either. I understand that Voight has his opinions and views that are in stark contrast to the ones I and many others might share. I respect his right to do that. But McCarthyism and red baiting is so last century. The neoconservatives have been crying about how the communists will take over America since the 1920s, and guess what? They haven’t. So get some new material.